September 3, 2020

Indian special forces soldier killed in China border skirmish

By Abdus Sattar Ghazali

A soldier of Tibetan origin with India's special forces has reportedly been killed in the latest border confrontation between India and China on their contested Himalayan border, fuelling concerns of a wider military confrontation between the two nuclear powers.

India has not commented on the reports of the death, but a member of the Tibetan Parliament in exile, told AFP on Tuesday that the Tibetan-origin soldier was “martyred during the clash”.  She did not identify the soldier by name.

She said another member of the Special Frontier Force, which includes many ethnic Tibetans, was wounded in the operation.

China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying, however, said on Wednesday that no Indian troops had died in the latest flare-up on their frontier. 

The world's two most populous countries have sent tens of thousands of troops to the region since a brutal June 15 battle fought with wooden clubs and fists.

The death sparks concerns of a wider military confrontation between the two neighbors. It comes two months after a battle that left at least 20 Indian soldiers dead, when a physical fight broke out between the two sides with soldiers using batons and throwing stones at each other.

India and China fought a war in 1962 over their competing territorial claims, and they have been unable to agree a permanent border along their frontier. The two nuclear neighbors have been locked in a standoff for months with both accusing each other of trespassing into the other’s territory.

Earlier, India's defense ministry said Chinese troops "carried out provocative military movements to change the status quo" at the border on Saturday.

Indian media reports, quoting military sources, said PLA forces tried to take hilltops traditionally claimed by India around Pangong Tso, a lake at an altitude of 4,200 metres (13,800 feet).

China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) said that India was "seriously violating China's territorial sovereignty" with its operation on Monday and demanded that Indian troops withdraw.

A Chinese embassy spokeswoman in New Delhi also denied that Chinese troops started the latest flare-up, accusing Indian troops of trespassing across the Line of Actual Control - the de facto border - and conducting "flagrant provocations".

In a statement on Tuesday, a United States Department of State spokesperson said Washington was closely monitoring the border dispute between India and China and it hoped for a peaceful resolution.

Amid calls for boycotts of Chinese goods, India has stepped up economic pressure on China since the June battle and repeatedly warned that relations would suffer unless its troops pull back.

India has banned at least 49 Chinese owned-apps, including the TikTok video platform, frozen Chinese firms out of contracts and held up Chinese goods at customs posts.

Indian troops first to cross LAC: Global Times

Official Chinese paper the Global Times Wednesday published a report saying that India is blaming China for Line of Actual Control (LAC) violation to divert  public attention from its government's failure to improve the economy and contain COVID-19

India's habitual boasts about its military strength, fabrication of victories and cover-ups of its provocations in recent border clashes with Chinese troops, which arise from its domestic need to divert public attention from its government's failure to improve the economy and contain COVID-19, make the whole world question its sincerity in maintaining the stability of the border area, the Global Times quoted Chinese analysts as saying.

India's actions fully reveal that it was the first to illegally cross the border in an act of provocation, and the responsibility and consequences will all lie on the Indian side if China takes tough countermeasures, analysts said. 

When Indian troops illegally crossed the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on Monday, the Indian army, which first moved to accuse China of carrying out "provocative military movements," said it "had preempted Chinese military activity."

The Indian army's statement fully proves that it was the first to illegally cross the border in an act of provocation, the first to unilaterally change the status quo in the border area, and the first to violate the important consensus reached by the two sides, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said on Wednesday.

"The responsibility rests entirely with the Indian side. China has exercised great restraint to prevent the situation from escalating," Hua said. 

Qian Feng, director of the research department at the National Strategy Institute at Tsinghua University, told the Global Times that as the military strength of both China and India is clearly known to the world, India, the weak party, uses the description of "preemptive actions," revealing the hubris of some Indian officials.

India must bear the responsibility and consequences if China takes tough countermeasures since it was the first to engage in provocation, Qian said. 

Fake videos

After the Monday incident, a short video depicting several Indian soldiers singing and dancing with two flags that showed the separatist symbol adopted by the "Tibetan government in exile" circulated widely on Twitter, according to Global Times.


The video excited some Indian netizens, who claimed India occupied the western section of the China-India border and these soldiers were clearly having a victory celebration. 

However, the authenticity of the video was widely questioned on social media. 

Many videos, photos and reports on China-India border clashes and India-Pakistan clashes circulated by the Indian side on social media have turned out to be fake, Qian said. 

In a recent example, some Indian netizens claimed on social media that an Indian official died during the latest clash with Chinese troops, but later, the Indian army said the official died in an accident that took place during the loading of an infantry combat vehicle.

Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Chief Editor of the Journal of America (www.journalofamerica.net) email: asghazali2011 (@) gmail.com
 

JOA-F
Home
Current_Issue_Nregular_1_1
Archives
Your_comments
About_Us
Legal

 The Journal of America Team:

 Editor in chief:
Abdus Sattar Ghazali

Senior Editor:
Prof. Arthur Scott

Special Correspondent
Maryam Turab

 

Syed Mahmood book
Front_page_title_small

 

Your donation 
is tax deductable.

21st Century
MuslimsInPolitics 2017 Front